CFAR Different Schemes Behavior and Detection Performance of Moving Targets
dc.contributor.author | Salem, Nema | |
dc.contributor.author | Salem, Ahmed | |
dc.contributor.author | ElBadawy, ElSayed | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-16T05:15:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-16T05:15:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14131/692 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper detection probability of different CFAR schemes CA, GO, SO, and OS-CFAR is computed via various values of false alarm probability. The CA-CFAR and GO-CFAR detection performance is superior over other schemes; OS-CFAR detection performance appears to be the quasi of CA-CFAR but needs more processing time than CA-CFAR. Moving target detection is investigated. Each of the CA, GO, OS-CFAR schemes gives acceptable detection probability at higher values of SNR and gives, as well, maximum performance in the range of 10-4 to 10-6 probability of false alarm. The SO-CFAR scheme doesn’t offer any advantage over other CFAR processors. | en_US |
dc.publisher | The International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics, IIIS | en_US |
dc.title | CFAR Different Schemes Behavior and Detection Performance of Moving Targets | en_US |
dc.contributor.researcher | No Collaboration | en_US |
dc.subject.KSA | ICT | en_US |
dc.source.index | Scopus | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Electrical and Computer Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.pgstudent | Ahmed Salem | en_US |
dc.contributor.firstauthor | Salem, Ahmed | |
dc.conference.location | Orlando, Florida, USA | en_US |
dc.conference.name | 8th International World multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, SCI-2004 | en_US |
dc.conference.date | 2004-07-18 |