Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalem, Nema
dc.contributor.authorSalem, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorElBadawy, ElSayed
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T05:15:44Z
dc.date.available2023-03-16T05:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2004-07
dc.identifier.citation4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14131/692
dc.description.abstractIn this paper detection probability of different CFAR schemes CA, GO, SO, and OS-CFAR is computed via various values of false alarm probability. The CA-CFAR and GO-CFAR detection performance is superior over other schemes; OS-CFAR detection performance appears to be the quasi of CA-CFAR but needs more processing time than CA-CFAR. Moving target detection is investigated. Each of the CA, GO, OS-CFAR schemes gives acceptable detection probability at higher values of SNR and gives, as well, maximum performance in the range of 10-4 to 10-6 probability of false alarm. The SO-CFAR scheme doesn’t offer any advantage over other CFAR processors.en_US
dc.publisherThe International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics, IIISen_US
dc.titleCFAR Different Schemes Behavior and Detection Performance of Moving Targetsen_US
dc.contributor.researcherNo Collaborationen_US
dc.subject.KSAICTen_US
dc.source.indexScopusen_US
dc.contributor.departmentElectrical and Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.pgstudentAhmed Salemen_US
dc.contributor.firstauthorSalem, Ahmed
dc.conference.locationOrlando, Florida, USAen_US
dc.conference.name8th International World multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, SCI-2004en_US
dc.conference.date2004-07-18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Ahmed Salem 1 SCI 04 B CRP07_v2.pdf
Size:
807.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record